BAILEY v. PATTERSON, 1:11-cv-321-WHA. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20141020447
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22), entered on September 11, 2014, and the Petitioner's Objection thereto (Doc. #25). Following an independent evaluation and de novo review of the entire file in this case, the court finds the objection to be without merit. The Petitioner merely objects with conclusory statements to the Magistrate Judge's determination in various paragraphs in the Recommend
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22), entered on September 11, 2014, and the Petitioner's Objection thereto (Doc. #25). Following an independent evaluation and de novo review of the entire file in this case, the court finds the objection to be without merit. The Petitioner merely objects with conclusory statements to the Magistrate Judge's determination in various paragraphs in the Recommenda..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22), entered on September 11, 2014, and the Petitioner's Objection thereto (Doc. #25).
Following an independent evaluation and de novo review of the entire file in this case, the court finds the objection to be without merit. The Petitioner merely objects with conclusory statements to the Magistrate Judge's determination in various paragraphs in the Recommendation. The court finds all of these objections to have been appropriately considered in the Recommendation, and the court agrees with the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that Petitioner's objection is OVERRULED, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and this petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
