THOMAS v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, 2:12-cv-1080-WKW(WO). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20141104598
Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. Before the court is Plaintiff Alvin Thomas's ("Plaintiff") Post-Trial Motion for Reconsideration and Hearing on the Merits (Doc. # 75), which requests the court to reconsider its entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America ("Defendant") and against Plaintiff as to all claims alleged in Plaintiff's complaint. On September 30, 2014, the court ordered Defendant to show cause why Plaintiff's motion f
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. Before the court is Plaintiff Alvin Thomas's ("Plaintiff") Post-Trial Motion for Reconsideration and Hearing on the Merits (Doc. # 75), which requests the court to reconsider its entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America ("Defendant") and against Plaintiff as to all claims alleged in Plaintiff's complaint. On September 30, 2014, the court ordered Defendant to show cause why Plaintiff's motion fo..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiff Alvin Thomas's ("Plaintiff") Post-Trial Motion for Reconsideration and Hearing on the Merits (Doc. # 75), which requests the court to reconsider its entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America ("Defendant") and against Plaintiff as to all claims alleged in Plaintiff's complaint. On September 30, 2014, the court ordered Defendant to show cause why Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration should not be granted. (Doc. # 77.) Defendant responded to the court's show cause order (Doc. # 77), arguing that none of the arguments or evidence presented in Plaintiff's motion warrants reconsideration of the court's finding at summary judgment that Plaintiff's claims are time-barred.
Based on the foregoing, and having considered the arguments of the parties, the applicable law, and the record as a whole, the court agrees with Defendant, and Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. # 75) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
