DANIELS v. U.S., 2:12cv1015-WHA. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150204b75
Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER AND OPINION W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. On January 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DENIED because it was not filed within the o
Summary: ORDER AND OPINION W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. On January 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DENIED because it was not filed within the on..
More
ORDER AND OPINION
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
On January 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED because it was not filed within the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f), and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
