RAMEY v. GILES, 2:12cv-021-WHA. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150205733
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18), entered on January 14, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The petitions for habeas corpus relief (Docs. #1 and #2) are DENIED as they were not filed within the period of limitation established by applicable federal law. 2.
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18), entered on January 14, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The petitions for habeas corpus relief (Docs. #1 and #2) are DENIED as they were not filed within the period of limitation established by applicable federal law. 2. ..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18), entered on January 14, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The petitions for habeas corpus relief (Docs. #1 and #2) are DENIED as they were not filed within the period of limitation established by applicable federal law.
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
