HAWTHORNE v. THOMAS, 1:12-cv-901-WHA(WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150212509
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), entered on January 26, 2015, and the Petitioner's Objections (Doc. #18), filed on February 4, 2015. The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case. Having done so, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's determination that this petition is time-barred, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), entered on January 26, 2015, and the Petitioner's Objections (Doc. #18), filed on February 4, 2015. The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case. Having done so, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's determination that this petition is time-barred, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner'..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), entered on January 26, 2015, and the Petitioner's Objections (Doc. #18), filed on February 4, 2015.
The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case. Having done so, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's determination that this petition is time-barred, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Petitioner's Objections are OVERRULED.
2. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
3. This petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
Source: Leagle
