FINLEY v. U.S., 3:13cv-565-WHA (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150701b07
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #29), entered on April 27, 2015. The Petitioner requested, and was given, two extensions of time to file an objection to the Recommendation and has not done so. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 2255 motion is DISMISSED with prejudi
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #29), entered on April 27, 2015. The Petitioner requested, and was given, two extensions of time to file an objection to the Recommendation and has not done so. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 2255 motion is DISMISSED with prejudic..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #29), entered on April 27, 2015. The Petitioner requested, and was given, two extensions of time to file an objection to the Recommendation and has not done so. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this § 2255 motion is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
