MURRAY v. PRICE, 2:13-cv-511-WHA (WO) (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150708911
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #32), entered on June 12, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED with prejudice, because this court is without jurisdiction to consider Murray's chal
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #32), entered on June 12, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED with prejudice, because this court is without jurisdiction to consider Murray's chall..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #32), entered on June 12, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED with prejudice, because this court is without jurisdiction to consider Murray's challenge to his expired firearm-possession conviction and because Murray's challenge to that conviction is also time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 224(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle