Filed: Jul. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 14, 2015
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings suit against the defendant correctional officers and officials complaining of sexual harassment, threats, deliberate indifference to the harassment and threats, retaliation, and, possibly, violations of due process. This cause is now before the court on the recommendation of the magistrate judge that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute the action. There are no objection
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings suit against the defendant correctional officers and officials complaining of sexual harassment, threats, deliberate indifference to the harassment and threats, retaliation, and, possibly, violations of due process. This cause is now before the court on the recommendation of the magistrate judge that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute the action. There are no objections..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings suit against the defendant correctional officers and officials complaining of sexual harassment, threats, deliberate indifference to the harassment and threats, retaliation, and, possibly, violations of due process. This cause is now before the court on the recommendation of the magistrate judge that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute the action. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation is due to be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
