ALLAH v. CHRISTBURG, 2:12cv-637-WHA (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150819598
Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #64), entered on July 27, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DENIED as moot. 2. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. #44 and #49) are GRANTED. 3. Final Judgment will
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #64), entered on July 27, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DENIED as moot. 2. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. #44 and #49) are GRANTED. 3. Final Judgment will b..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #64), entered on July 27, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DENIED as moot.
2. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. #44 and #49) are GRANTED.
3. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of the Defendants.
Source: Leagle
