YOUNGBLOOD v. ALA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 2:15cv214-MHT. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150902531
Visitors: 27
Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This matter is before the court on plaintiff's objection to the court's order assessing a $505 filing fee on his second notice of interlocutory appeal. Plaintiff argues that the second notice of interlocutory appeal should have been treated as an amended notice of interlocutory appeal, and the new filing fee should not have been assessed. Upon consideration of the objection, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The objection (doc. no. 77) is construed as
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This matter is before the court on plaintiff's objection to the court's order assessing a $505 filing fee on his second notice of interlocutory appeal. Plaintiff argues that the second notice of interlocutory appeal should have been treated as an amended notice of interlocutory appeal, and the new filing fee should not have been assessed. Upon consideration of the objection, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The objection (doc. no. 77) is construed as ..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiff's objection to the court's order assessing a $505 filing fee on his second notice of interlocutory appeal. Plaintiff argues that the second notice of interlocutory appeal should have been treated as an amended notice of interlocutory appeal, and the new filing fee should not have been assessed. Upon consideration of the objection, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The objection (doc. no. 77) is construed as a motion for reconsideration.
(2) The motion for reconsideration (doc. no. 77) is granted.
(3) The order (doc. no. 74) assessing fees for the second notice of appeal is vacated.
Source: Leagle
