Filed: Oct. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12), entered on September 11, 2015, and the Petitioner's Objection (Doc. #13), filed on September 22, 2015. The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case and, after doing so, finds the objection to be without merit. In his objection, the Petitioner merely restates the arguments made in his petition. Those
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12), entered on September 11, 2015, and the Petitioner's Objection (Doc. #13), filed on September 22, 2015. The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case and, after doing so, finds the objection to be without merit. In his objection, the Petitioner merely restates the arguments made in his petition. Those a..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12), entered on September 11, 2015, and the Petitioner's Objection (Doc. #13), filed on September 22, 2015.
The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case and, after doing so, finds the objection to be without merit.
In his objection, the Petitioner merely restates the arguments made in his petition. Those arguments were thoroughly discussed and rejected in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and the Petitioner's objection presents nothing which undermines the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The court agrees with the reasoning and conclusions contained in the Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Petitioner's objection is OVERRULED.
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
3. This petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
