CARTER v. THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, 2:15-CV-555-WKW (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20151208973
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . Before the court is the unopposed motion for leave to file a supplement to the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant CHC Companies, Inc. ("CHC"). (Doc. # 47.) Upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. # 47) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED 1. that, on or before December 9, 2015, Defendant CHC shall file a supplemental motion to dismiss; 2. that, no later than twenty-one (21) days after Defe
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . Before the court is the unopposed motion for leave to file a supplement to the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant CHC Companies, Inc. ("CHC"). (Doc. # 47.) Upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. # 47) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED 1. that, on or before December 9, 2015, Defendant CHC shall file a supplemental motion to dismiss; 2. that, no later than twenty-one (21) days after Defen..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
Before the court is the unopposed motion for leave to file a supplement to the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant CHC Companies, Inc. ("CHC"). (Doc. # 47.) Upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. # 47) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED
1. that, on or before December 9, 2015, Defendant CHC shall file a supplemental motion to dismiss;
2. that, no later than twenty-one (21) days after Defendant CHC's supplemental motion is filed, Plaintiff shall file a brief in response to the supplemental motion; and
3. that, within seven (7) days of the filing of Plaintiff's response to the supplemental motion, Defendant CHC may file a single reply to both of Plaintiffs' briefs in response to CHC's motion and supplemental motion to dismiss.
Source: Leagle
