WILLIAMS v. HEALTH SERVICES, INC., 2:14cv977-MHT (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20151214548
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2015
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq., plaintiff Zippora D. Williams filed this lawsuit complaining that defendant Health Services, Inc. suspended and terminated her because of her race and gender and in retaliation for reporting the sexual harassment of one of her subordinate employees. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq., plaintiff Zippora D. Williams filed this lawsuit complaining that defendant Health Services, Inc. suspended and terminated her because of her race and gender and in retaliation for reporting the sexual harassment of one of her subordinate employees. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United ..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., plaintiff Zippora D. Williams filed this lawsuit complaining that defendant Health Services, Inc. suspended and terminated her because of her race and gender and in retaliation for reporting the sexual harassment of one of her subordinate employees. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that Health Services's motion for summary judgment in its favor on all claims be granted. Also before the court are Williams's objections to the recommendation. After hearing oral argument from the parties on December 9, 2015, and after an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
