U.S. v. HARRIS, 3:09cr112-MHT (WO). (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160111493
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Upon consideration of the Retroactivity Screening Panel's revised recommendation (doc. no. 67), the court has concerns about the Panel's conclusion. Specifically, the court wishes to hear the views of defendant Tiombe Harris and the government as to whether the method of calculating the sentence reduction employed in the recommendation is appropriate in this case, in light of the court's determinations at the original sentencing and U.S.S.G. 1B1.
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Upon consideration of the Retroactivity Screening Panel's revised recommendation (doc. no. 67), the court has concerns about the Panel's conclusion. Specifically, the court wishes to hear the views of defendant Tiombe Harris and the government as to whether the method of calculating the sentence reduction employed in the recommendation is appropriate in this case, in light of the court's determinations at the original sentencing and U.S.S.G. 1B1.1..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Upon consideration of the Retroactivity Screening Panel's revised recommendation (doc. no. 67), the court has concerns about the Panel's conclusion. Specifically, the court wishes to hear the views of defendant Tiombe Harris and the government as to whether the method of calculating the sentence reduction employed in the recommendation is appropriate in this case, in light of the court's determinations at the original sentencing and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) & cmt. n. 4(B).
As defendant Tiombe Harris would benefit from counsel to represent him on this matter, it is ORDERED that the clerk of the court is to arrange for the appointment of counsel for defendant Harris.
Source: Leagle
