HALL v. JONES, 2:14-cv-098-WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160315a47
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #13), entered on February 16, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the one year limitati
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #13), entered on February 16, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the one year limitatio..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #13), entered on February 16, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the one year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
