GORDON v. U.S., 2:15cv758-MHT. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160504809
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's motion to dismiss the Bivens counts from her complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) should be granted, and that counts II through V of the complaint, as well as defendant Jim Tynan and the "fictitious defendants," should be dismissed without prejudice. There are no objections to the recommendation. After
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's motion to dismiss the Bivens counts from her complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) should be granted, and that counts II through V of the complaint, as well as defendant Jim Tynan and the "fictitious defendants," should be dismissed without prejudice. There are no objections to the recommendation. After a..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's motion to dismiss the Bivens counts from her complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) should be granted, and that counts II through V of the complaint, as well as defendant Jim Tynan and the "fictitious defendants," should be dismissed without prejudice. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
