Brown v. Dillard, 2:13-cv-815-WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160518719
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #41), entered on April 20, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs o
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #41), entered on April 20, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs of..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #41), entered on April 20, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the Plaintiff.
Source: Leagle
