Williams v. Tyner, 2:16cv110-MHT (WO). (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160520753
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 19, 2016
Latest Update: May 19, 2016
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit challenging his prison officials' misclassification of him based on false information and retaliation for his litigation activities. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's claims against defendants Bridgett Tyner and Kevin Genous be dismissed without prejudice. Also before the court are plaintiff
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit challenging his prison officials' misclassification of him based on false information and retaliation for his litigation activities. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's claims against defendants Bridgett Tyner and Kevin Genous be dismissed without prejudice. Also before the court are plaintiff'..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit challenging his prison officials' misclassification of him based on false information and retaliation for his litigation activities. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's claims against defendants Bridgett Tyner and Kevin Genous be dismissed without prejudice. Also before the court are plaintiff's objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that plaintiff's objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
