THOMAS v. WYNNE, 2:13cv346-MHT. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160714903
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2016
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit claiming that he was unfairly denied parole on the basis of false and otherwise inappropriate information, and without an adequate opportunity to present rebuttal evidence. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motions for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation.
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit claiming that he was unfairly denied parole on the basis of false and otherwise inappropriate information, and without an adequate opportunity to present rebuttal evidence. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motions for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. ..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit claiming that he was unfairly denied parole on the basis of false and otherwise inappropriate information, and without an adequate opportunity to present rebuttal evidence. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motions for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
