Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRASWELL v. GLOVIS AMERICA, INC., 2:16-CV-822-WKW. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20170327818 Visitors: 1
Filed: Mar. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. #20.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #20) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant's motion to partially dismiss (Doc. #12) is DENIED; 3. Defendant's motion to stay (Doc. #12) is GRANTED; 4. Plaintiff is ORDERED to notify the court within five
More

ORDER

Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. #20.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #20) is ADOPTED;

2. Defendant's motion to partially dismiss (Doc. #12) is DENIED;

3. Defendant's motion to stay (Doc. #12) is GRANTED;

4. Plaintiff is ORDERED to notify the court within five days of his receipt of a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. In the notice, Plaintiff should explain whether he intends to amend his complaint in light of the right-to-sue letter. If Plaintiff does not receive a right-to-sue letter, he should notify the court how he wishes to proceed; and

5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to administratively close this case until further notification is received from Plaintiff.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer