WILLIAMS v. WHITESIDE, 2:16-CV-942-WKW. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20170616835
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 19.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 19) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant John Crow's motion for summary judgment (Docs. # 15, 17) is GRANTED; 3. The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Whiteside, Parker, Ellis, and Oden (Doc. # 14
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 19.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 19) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant John Crow's motion for summary judgment (Docs. # 15, 17) is GRANTED; 3. The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Whiteside, Parker, Ellis, and Oden (Doc. # 14)..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 19.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 19) is ADOPTED;
2. Defendant John Crow's motion for summary judgment (Docs. # 15, 17) is GRANTED;
3. The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Whiteside, Parker, Ellis, and Oden (Doc. # 14) is GRANTED for Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies;
4. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies; and
5. No costs are taxed.
A final judgment will be entered separately.
Source: Leagle
