Dyal v. Louria, 2:17cv618-MHT. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180314869
Visitors: 37
Filed: Mar. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2018
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit asserting that defendant, an agent with the Investigations and Intelligence Division of the Alabama Department of Corrections, failed to prevent plaintiff from returning to Staton Correctional Facility after he had been attacked by inmates during a previous stay there. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that this ca
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit asserting that defendant, an agent with the Investigations and Intelligence Division of the Alabama Department of Corrections, failed to prevent plaintiff from returning to Staton Correctional Facility after he had been attacked by inmates during a previous stay there. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that this cas..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit asserting that defendant, an agent with the Investigations and Intelligence Division of the Alabama Department of Corrections, failed to prevent plaintiff from returning to Staton Correctional Facility after he had been attacked by inmates during a previous stay there. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice. There are no objections to the recommendation. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
