Alverson v. Dunn, 2:16cv928-MHT. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180329842
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary injunction in which he contends that one of the defendants transferred him from Draper Correctional Facility to Easterling Correctional Facility in retaliation for filing this civil action. He requests that the court order the defendants to transfer him to a different facility. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that th
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary injunction in which he contends that one of the defendants transferred him from Draper Correctional Facility to Easterling Correctional Facility in retaliation for filing this civil action. He requests that the court order the defendants to transfer him to a different facility. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary injunction in which he contends that one of the defendants transferred him from Draper Correctional Facility to Easterling Correctional Facility in retaliation for filing this civil action. He requests that the court order the defendants to transfer him to a different facility. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied. Also before the court are plaintiff's objections to the recommendation. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court is of the opinion that objections should be overruled and the recommendation should be adopted.
* * *
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 106) are overruled.
(2) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 102) is adopted.
(3) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 95) is denied.
This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Source: Leagle
