Moore v. Corizon Meidical Services, 2:16-CV-13-WHA. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180516a38
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 15, 2018
Latest Update: May 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on April 25, 2018 (Doc. #56). There being no objection to the Recommendation, and after review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on April 25, 2018 (Doc. #56). There being no objection to the Recommendation, and after review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against t..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on April 25, 2018 (Doc. #56). There being no objection to the Recommendation, and after review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff.
A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
Source: Leagle
