U.S. v. Porter, 2:18-cr-155-LSC-WC. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180828897
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER L. SCOTT COOGLER , District Judge . The defendant has filed a motion to suppress. (Doc. 33.) The magistrate judge held an evidentiary hearing on the motion and subsequently filed a report and recommendation, recommending that the motion be denied in part and granted in part. (Doc. 44.) The United States objected with respect to the in-part grant. (Doc. 50.) Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER L. SCOTT COOGLER , District Judge . The defendant has filed a motion to suppress. (Doc. 33.) The magistrate judge held an evidentiary hearing on the motion and subsequently filed a report and recommendation, recommending that the motion be denied in part and granted in part. (Doc. 44.) The United States objected with respect to the in-part grant. (Doc. 50.) Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including t..
More
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge.
The defendant has filed a motion to suppress. (Doc. 33.) The magistrate judge held an evidentiary hearing on the motion and subsequently filed a report and recommendation, recommending that the motion be denied in part and granted in part. (Doc. 44.) The United States objected with respect to the in-part grant. (Doc. 50.)
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the motion to suppress (doc. 33) is hereby DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
