Williams v. Gams, 2:15cv705-MHT. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180904684
Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state law, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit contending that she received inadequate medical care in prison and that her rights were violated in the disciplinary process. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the medical defendants' motion to dismiss be granted to the extent they seek dismissal for failure to exhaust, as plaintiff entire
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state law, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit contending that she received inadequate medical care in prison and that her rights were violated in the disciplinary process. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the medical defendants' motion to dismiss be granted to the extent they seek dismissal for failure to exhaust, as plaintiff entirel..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit contending that she received inadequate medical care in prison and that her rights were violated in the disciplinary process. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the medical defendants' motion to dismiss be granted to the extent they seek dismissal for failure to exhaust, as plaintiff entirely failed to respond to the argument; that the correctional defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted on plaintiff's § 1983 claims for negligence and deliberate indifference; that plaintiff's § 1983 disciplinary claims against the correctional defendants be dismissed without prejudice as they are not properly before the court at this time; and that plaintiff's state-law claims be dismissed without prejudice. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that plaintiff's objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
