Bossio v. Bishop, 3:16-CV-839-ECM. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180914g42
Visitors: 21
Filed: Sep. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On August 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc. # 75), that the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied. The plaintiff timely objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. # 78). Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and the Recommendation, the plaintiff's objections are due to be overruled and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommenda
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On August 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc. # 75), that the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied. The plaintiff timely objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. # 78). Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and the Recommendation, the plaintiff's objections are due to be overruled and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendat..
More
ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, District Judge.
On August 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc. # 75), that the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied. The plaintiff timely objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. # 78). Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and the Recommendation, the plaintiff's objections are due to be overruled and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. # 75) is ADOPTED.
2. The plaintiff's objections (doc. # 78) are OVERRULED.
3. The plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED.
4. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Source: Leagle
