Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On September 21, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 43) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. The plaintiff's illegal search, false arrest and malicious prosecution claims are DISMISSED without preju
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On September 21, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 43) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. The plaintiff's illegal search, false arrest and malicious prosecution claims are DISMISSED without prejud..
More
ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, District Judge.
On September 21, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 43) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
3. The plaintiff's illegal search, false arrest and malicious prosecution claims are DISMISSED without prejudice as the claims are not properly before the Court in this action.
4. The plaintiff's claim for criminal prosecution of the defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice.
5. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants.
6. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
7. Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff.
A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
