Reese v. Jones, 2:17cv295-MHT. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20181101775
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2018
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit complaining that correctional officers failed to intervene when he was stabbed by another prisoner, failed to testify at his disciplinary hearing, and failed to protect him after the assault, and challenging his receipt of a disciplinary citation from the stabbing incident. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit complaining that correctional officers failed to intervene when he was stabbed by another prisoner, failed to testify at his disciplinary hearing, and failed to protect him after the assault, and challenging his receipt of a disciplinary citation from the stabbing incident. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge t..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit complaining that correctional officers failed to intervene when he was stabbed by another prisoner, failed to testify at his disciplinary hearing, and failed to protect him after the assault, and challenging his receipt of a disciplinary citation from the stabbing incident. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
