Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Agee v. Department of the Army, 1:18-CV-116-WKW (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20181218888 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . On November 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 44.) Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. # 44) is ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Additionally, Plaintiff responded to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by filing a document she titled Motion Not to Dismiss
More

ORDER

On November 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 44.) Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. # 44) is ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Additionally, Plaintiff responded to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by filing a document she titled Motion Not to Dismiss Case (Doc. # 41). Defendants' motion was filed pursuant to Rules (12)(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but there is no procedural rule that allows a motion not to dismiss the case. Instead, this purported motion is properly construed as a response to Defendants' motion. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to construe Plaintiff's purported motion (Doc. # 41) as a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 38).

A separate final judgment will be entered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer