Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Southern Pioneer Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Newsome, 1:18-CV-461-GMB. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20181228619 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2018
Summary: CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRAY M. BORDEN , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with the Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment (Doc. 16), filed December 21, 2018, Plaintiff Southern Pioneer Property & Casualty Insurance Company ("Southern Pioneer") and Defendant Terry Newsome d/b/a Chazz Automotive ("Newsome") (collectively "the parties") agree to resolve all matters in this action, and consent to entry of a Judgment and Order by this court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rul
More

CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER

In accordance with the Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment (Doc. 16), filed December 21, 2018, Plaintiff Southern Pioneer Property & Casualty Insurance Company ("Southern Pioneer") and Defendant Terry Newsome d/b/a Chazz Automotive ("Newsome") (collectively "the parties") agree to resolve all matters in this action, and consent to entry of a Judgment and Order by this court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. Docs. 10 & 11.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion (16) is GRANTED and judgment is hereby ENTERED as follows:

1. That there is a bona fide controversy between the parties as to their legal rights, duties, status, and liability;

2. That the subject insurance policy (No. CP00006661) (the "subject policy") issued to Terry Newsome d/b/a Chazz Automotive is void ab initio;

3. That Southern Pioneer has a right to rescind the subject policy accordingly;

4. That, because the Policy is rescinded and void ab initio, Southern Pioneer has no coverage obligations under the Policy for any claims made against any insured;

5. That the subject policy is hereby rescinded;

6. That this final judgment is hereby ENTERED against Defendant and in favor of the Plaintiff; and

7. That costs be taxed as paid.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer