Gray v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 1:18cv52-ECM. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190108597
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2019
Summary: OPINION and ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . This litigation is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on December 18, 2018, (doc. 25) that the defendant's motion to dismiss be granted because the plaintiff did not exhaust her administrative remedies. After a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation shou
Summary: OPINION and ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . This litigation is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on December 18, 2018, (doc. 25) that the defendant's motion to dismiss be granted because the plaintiff did not exhaust her administrative remedies. After a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation shoul..
More
OPINION and ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, District Judge.
This litigation is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on December 18, 2018, (doc. 25) that the defendant's motion to dismiss be granted because the plaintiff did not exhaust her administrative remedies. After a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 11) be and is hereby GRANTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
