Braggs v. Dunn, 2:14cv601-MHT. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190318714
Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2019
Summary: PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made on the record on March 14, 2019, it is ORDERED that the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows: OLD DATES NEW DATES SEGREGATION Parties to develop schemes to Continued verify that defendants are now generally pending a
Summary: PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made on the record on March 14, 2019, it is ORDERED that the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows: OLD DATES NEW DATES SEGREGATION Parties to develop schemes to Continued verify that defendants are now generally pending ac..
More
PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Based on the representations made on the record on March 14, 2019, it is ORDERED that the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows:
OLD DATES NEW DATES
SEGREGATION
Parties to develop schemes to Continued
verify that defendants are now generally pending
accurately and timely identifying mediation and
SMI inmates with regard to resolution of the
segregation monitoring issue
In-person oral argument on how to To be reset. 5/14/19 at 10:00 a.m.
proceed on remedies for
violations found in supplemental
liability opinion. (doc. nos.
2353, 2397, & 2398).
HOSPITAL-LEVEL CARE
Parties to file initial briefs 5/1/19 at noon
for upcoming oral argument.
Parties to file reply briefs for 5/8/19 at noon
upcoming oral argument.
In-person oral argument to To be reset. 5/14/19 at 10:00 a.m.
discuss "what the substantive law
is" and "how" to proceed in
light of defendants' statement as
to whether revised stipulations
meet the PLRA's
`need-narrowness-intrusiveness'
requirements. (doc. nos. 2383 &
2382). Counsel for plaintiffs
have already said that they do.
SUICIDE PREVENTION
Oral argument and hearing on 3/27/19 at 9:00
parties' joint proposals on a.m.
`methods' defendants can use to
verify that segregation rounds
are being properly conducted in
segregation and segregation-like
settings. (doc. nos. 2345, 2380,
2410, & 2414.).
Oral argument and hearing 3/27/19 at 9:00
parties' submission of list of a.m.
the agreed-upon
segregation-like settings, as
well as the settings
about which they may not be able
to reach an agreement. (doc. nos.
2345 & 2364).
Oral argument and hearing on 3/27/19 at 9:00
defendants' development of a a.m.
`review
process' that collects and
consolidates information on
at least a weekly basis for each
prisoner in ADOC with SMI who is
housed in segregation; that is, a
"tracking process." (doc. nos.
2345, 2377, & 2406-07).
Oral argument and hearing on 3/27/19 at 9:00
parties' submission of joint a.m.
report to the court as to other
prisons that do not place (or
significantly limit the placement
of) SMI prisoners in segregation.
(doc. nos. 2345 & 2379).
Oral argument on how to proceed 3/27/19 at 9:00
on defendants' initial submission a.m.
of the results for "tracking
process' of SMIs in segregation.
(doc. nos. 2345, 2357, & 2408).
Pretrial briefs on all remaining 3/22/19 at noon
issues, including but not limited
to further addressing whether
plaintiffs' motion for
preliminary injunctions (doc. no.
2276) has been properly
characterized as preliminary,
rather than simply post-liability
finding, relief and the legal and
factual implications that should
follow.
Pretrial hearing on all remaining 3/25/19 at 10:00
issues. a.m., with the
courtroom deputy
to arrange for
the hearing to be
conducted by
telephone
Evidentiary hearing on 3/27/19 through
plaintiffs' motion for 4/10/19 at 9:00
preliminary injunctions. (doc. a.m. each day
no. 2276)
Evidentiary hearing on all 3/27/19 through
remaining issues. 4/10/19 at 9:00
a.m. each day
DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS
Parties to file initial briefs 5/1/19 at noon
for upcoming oral argument.
Parties to file reply briefs for 5/8/19 at noon
upcoming oral argument.
In-person oral argument to To be reset. 5/14/19 at 10:00 a.m.
discuss "what the substantive law
is" and "how" to proceed in light
of defendants' statement as to
whether revised stipulations
meet the PLRA's
`need-narrowness-intrusiveness'
requirements. (doc. nos. 2384 &
2382). Counsel for plaintiffs
have already said that they do.
Parties to resubmit stipulations 3/21/19
to address training issue. (doc.
no. 2374).
MONITORING
Parties to file initial briefs 5/1/19 at noon
for upcoming oral argument.
Parties to file reply briefs for 5/8/19 at noon
upcoming oral argument.
In-person oral argument to 5/14/19 at 10:00 a.m.
discuss "what the substantive law
is" and "how" to proceed as to
the monitoring remedial issue in
light of defendants' statement as
to whether all remedial
stipulations previously approved
and adopted by the court meet the
PLRA's
`need-narrowness-intrusiveness'
requirements.
MISCELLANEOUS
Parties to file initial briefs 5/1/19 at noon
for upcoming oral argument.
Parties to file reply briefs for 5/8/19 at noon
upcoming oral argument.
In-person oral argument to To be reset. 5/14/19 at 10:00 a.m.
discuss "what the substantive law
is" and "how" to proceed in light
of defendants' statement as to
whether all remedial stipulations
previously approved and adopted
by the court meet the PLRA's
`need-narrowness-intrusiveness'
requirements. (doc. no. 2382).
Counsel for plaintiffs have
already said that they do.
Source: Leagle
