Shaper v. Forniss, 2:16-CV-370-WHA. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190319718
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, III , Senior District Judge . On February 25, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #92) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of this court and his abandonment of his claims fo
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, III , Senior District Judge . On February 25, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #92) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of this court and his abandonment of his claims for..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, III, Senior District Judge.
On February 25, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #92) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of this court and his abandonment of his claims for relief in light of digital video recordings submitted as evidence by the defendants.
3. The parties shall bear their own costs.
A separate Final Judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
