Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Braggs v. Dunn, 2:14cv601-MHT. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20190517896 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 16, 2019
Latest Update: May 16, 2019
Summary: PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made on the record on May 14, 2019, it is ORDERED that the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows: OLD DATES NEW DATES SEGREGATION Parties to develop schemes to verify Continued that defendants are now accurately and generally pending ti
More

PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM

Based on the representations made on the record on May 14, 2019, it is ORDERED that the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows:

OLD DATES NEW DATES SEGREGATION Parties to develop schemes to verify Continued that defendants are now accurately and generally pending timely identifying SMI inmates with mediation and regard to segregation. resolution of the monitoring issue Evidentiary hearing on remedy for 7/8/19 at violations found in supplemental 10:00 a.m., liability opinion. (Doc. nos. 2353, and 7/9 and 2397, & 2398). 7/10/19 at 9:00 a.m. Remedy for violations found in initial Under submission liability opinion. HOSPITAL-LEVEL CARE Evidentiary hearing on whether parties' 7/8/19 at proposed stipulations comply with PLRA. 10:00 a.m., (Doc. no. 2383). and 7/9 and 7/10/19 at 9:00 a.m. Vitek issue. Under submission SUICIDE PREVENTION Evidentiary hearing on (1) the adequacy 7/8/19 at of the defendants' "review process" for 10:00 a.m., collecting information about prisoners and 7/9 and with SMIs in segregation, (doc. no. 7/10/19 at 2345), as well as (2) what the court 9:00 a.m. should do with the information the defendants provide as a result of the "review process." E.g., (doc. no. 2408-1). Parties are allowed to meet with Judge By 5/18/19 Ott to attempt to agree on the details of internal and external monitoring not already resolved in the opinion on immediate suicide prevention. (Doc. no. 2526). Defendants are to file a proposal that 5/25/19 5/28/19 at includes both external and internal 5:00 p.m. monitoring schemes in the event that parties cannot reach an agreement on this issue by 5/18/19. (Doc. no. 2526). Plaintiffs are to file a response to 6/1/19 6/4/19 at defendants' proposal on external and 5:00 p.m. internal monitoring schemes. (Doc. no. 2526). Completion of pre-placement screening 6/3/19 training for all nurses who perform such screenings for segregation or who supervise nurses performing such screenings. See (doc. no. 2526). "Segregation-like" issues. Under submission, though the court may reopen the matter Evidentiary hearing on all remaining 7/8/19 at issues. 10:00 a.m., and 7/9 and 7/10/19 at 9:00 a.m. DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS Evidentiary hearing of whether parties' 7/8/19 at proposed stipulations comply with PLRA. 10:00 a.m., (Doc. nos. 2384 & 2382). and 7/9 and 7/10/19 at 9:00 a.m. MONITORING Remedy. Under submission RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND STABILIZATION UNITS Remedy. Under submission MISCELLANEOUS Evidentiary hearing on whether the 7/8/19 at following stipulations and orders 10:00 a.m., comply with the PLRA: and 7/9 and —Intake (doc. nos. 1780 & 1794) 7/10/19 at —Coding (doc. nos. 1779 & 1792) 9:00 a.m. —Referral (doc. nos. 1786, 1814, & 1821) —Individual treatment plans (doc. nos. 1853 & 1865) —Psychotherapy and confidentiality (doc. nos. 1893 & 1899) —Definition of SMI (doc. no. 1720) —Bibb segregation issues (doc. nos. 1748 & 1751) —Preplacement screening, etc. (doc. nos. 1798, 1810, 1811, & 1815) —Removing SMIs from segregation (doc. nos. 1855 & 1861) —Confidentiality (doc. nos. 1894 & 1900) —Mental-health understaffing (doc. nos. 2283 & 2301 Parties are to file a joint report on 5/24/19 at whether the "miscellaneous" noon. stipulations and orders listed above include, or omit, items, and, if so, how. If the parties differ, they should note their difference(s) in their joint report. In-person pretrial conference on ALL 6/28/19 at matters in this order set for hearing 9:00 a.m. on 7/8/19 at 10:00 a.m. The court understands that, for ALL the matters set for hearing on 7/8/19, the plaintiffs also rely on all the evidence already presented on the suicide-prevention matters Parties to file a joint pretrial 6/25/19 at statement setting forth their positions noon. on ALL the matters in this order set for hearing on 7/8/19. An in-person status conference on how 6/4/19 at parties are progressing in their 2:00 p.m. "pursuit of a path" toward "global resolution" of this case and related cases and proceedings, and on any other matters that warrant the court's attention.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer