Brooks v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, 2:16cv891-MHT. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190529a38
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, petitioner, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit challenging the legality and constitutionality of the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles' setting of his initial parole consideration date. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the petition be denied. Also before the court are petitioner's objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, petitioner, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit challenging the legality and constitutionality of the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles' setting of his initial parole consideration date. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the petition be denied. Also before the court are petitioner's objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo ..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, petitioner, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit challenging the legality and constitutionality of the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles' setting of his initial parole consideration date. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the petition be denied. Also before the court are petitioner's objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that petitioner's objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
