Ward v. Bruton, 2:16-cv-559-ALB. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190613911
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER ANDREW L. BRASHER , District Judge . On May 23, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 28) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. The cost
Summary: ORDER ANDREW L. BRASHER , District Judge . On May 23, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 28) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. The costs..
More
ORDER
ANDREW L. BRASHER, District Judge.
On May 23, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 28) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant.
4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
5. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff.
A separate Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
