Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McConico v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole, 2:19cv111-MHT. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20190716853 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This cause is now before the court on the petitioner's notice of appeal (doc. no. 47), which the court is treating as a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. * 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) provides that "[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." In making this determination as to good faith, a court must use an objective standard, such as whether the appeal is "f
More

ORDER

This cause is now before the court on the petitioner's notice of appeal (doc. no. 47), which the court is treating as a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.*

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) provides that "[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." In making this determination as to good faith, a court must use an objective standard, such as whether the appeal is "frivolous," Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962), or "has no substantive merit." United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. Allen, 666 F.2d 519, 520 (11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam); Morris v. Ross, 663 F.2d 1032 (11th Cir. 1981). Applying this standard, this court is of the opinion that the petitioner's appeal is without a legal or factual basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not taken in good faith. See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F.Supp. 1382 (S.D. Fla. 1977), aff'd without opinion, 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1979).

***

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied; and that the appeal in this cause is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), as not taken in good faith.

FootNotes


* Petitioner filed this notice of appeal in relation to the court's June 7, 2019, judgment. Apparently, he filed the notice of appeal before learning that the court had vacated that judgment. See Order (doc. no. 45). Because an appeal from a vacated judgment is moot, petitioner may wish to withdraw this notice of appeal.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer