United States v. Easterly, 2:18cr243-MHT. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20191230495
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Defendant William Dcory Maurice Easterly moved to dismiss the indictment against him, with prejudice, because of an alleged violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that Easterly's motion to dismiss be denied. Also before the court are Easterly's pro se objections to the recommendation, filed after defense counsel opted not to file
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Defendant William Dcory Maurice Easterly moved to dismiss the indictment against him, with prejudice, because of an alleged violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that Easterly's motion to dismiss be denied. Also before the court are Easterly's pro se objections to the recommendation, filed after defense counsel opted not to file ..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Defendant William Dcory Maurice Easterly moved to dismiss the indictment against him, with prejudice, because of an alleged violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that Easterly's motion to dismiss be denied. Also before the court are Easterly's pro se objections to the recommendation, filed after defense counsel opted not to file objections.
Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the objections should be overruled and the recommendation adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The pro se objections (doc. no. 521-1) are overruled.
(2) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 474) is adopted.
(3) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 443) is denied.
Source: Leagle
