Howard v. United States, 3:20cv79-MHT. (2020)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20200316963
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2020
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that petitioner's "Motion to Vacate Judgement Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6)," which is a successive motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255, be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the required permission for a successive motion has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. There are no objecti
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that petitioner's "Motion to Vacate Judgement Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6)," which is a successive motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255, be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the required permission for a successive motion has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. There are no objectio..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that petitioner's "Motion to Vacate Judgement Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6)," which is a successive motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the required permission for a successive motion has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE.
Source: Leagle
