PINSON v. RATHMAN, 1:10-cv-02477-IPJ-HGD. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130821862
Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, Senior District Judge. On August 9, 2013, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. On August 14, 2013, petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and the
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, Senior District Judge. On August 9, 2013, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. On August 14, 2013, petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and the p..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, Senior District Judge.
On August 9, 2013, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. On August 14, 2013, petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and the petitioner's objections thereto, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.
A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously herewith.
Source: Leagle
