Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ANDREWS v. SATTERFIELD, 2:13-CV-942-RDP-TMP. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama Number: infdco20140515772 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 14, 2014
Latest Update: May 14, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge. On April 29, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 be denied and dismissed as moot. (Doc. 18). To date, no objections have been filed by either party. The Report and Recommendation mailed to Petitioner has been returned as undeliverable, and marked that he is "no longer here." Having now carefull
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION

R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge.

On April 29, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be denied and dismissed as moot. (Doc. 18). To date, no objections have been filed by either party. The Report and Recommendation mailed to Petitioner has been returned as undeliverable, and marked that he is "no longer here."

Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause is due to be denied and dismissed. A separate order will be entered herewith.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer