ALVAREZ v. HASSELL, 4:13-cv-02260-JHH-HGD. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140624738
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2014
Summary: DISMISSAL ORDER JAMES H. HANCOCK, Senior District Judge. On May 28, 2014, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed by petitioner or respondents. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the
Summary: DISMISSAL ORDER JAMES H. HANCOCK, Senior District Judge. On May 28, 2014, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed by petitioner or respondents. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the ..
More
DISMISSAL ORDER
JAMES H. HANCOCK, Senior District Judge.
On May 28, 2014, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed by petitioner or respondents.
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this action is due to be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature.
Source: Leagle
