Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GROCE v. FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION, 3:13-cv-01769-HGD (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama Number: infdco20140718720 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2014
Summary: PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, District Judge. On June 20, 2014, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed by plaintiff or defendants. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommenda
More

PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER

SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, District Judge.

On June 20, 2014, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed by plaintiff or defendants.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that

(1) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Title VII claim for wrongful termination based on her race is due to be and hereby is DENIED;

(2) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Title VII claim for failure to promote based on her race is due to be and hereby is GRANTED, and such claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

(3) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Title VII claim for racially hostile environment and Title VII claim against defendant Gene Ellison in his individual capacity is MOOT;

(4) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 is due to be and hereby is GRANTED, and such claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

(5) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for disparate treatment is due to be and hereby is DENIED;

(6) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for racially hostile environment is MOOT;

(7) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against defendant Gene Ellison based on qualified immunity is due to be and hereby is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to reasserting a qualified immunity claim on summary judgment;

(8) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim against the Franklin County Commission and Franklin County Revenue Commission is due to be and hereby is DENIED; and

(9) defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim against defendant Gene Ellison in his individual capacity is MOOT.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer