Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LLOVERA LINARES v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 4:14-cv-00678-KOB-SGC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama Number: infdco20150316914 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE , Chief District Judge . Rafael Alberto Llovera Linares, a detainee of United States Immigrations and Customs Enforcement proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. (Doc. 1). On February 13, 2015, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending that the court dismiss for lack of jurisdiction that portion of the petition requesting review of the order removing the petitioner to Venezuela and deny th
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rafael Alberto Llovera Linares, a detainee of United States Immigrations and Customs Enforcement proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). On February 13, 2015, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending that the court dismiss for lack of jurisdiction that portion of the petition requesting review of the order removing the petitioner to Venezuela and deny the remaining portion of the petition challenging the petitioner's continued detention. (Doc. 14 at 8). The magistrate judge further recommended the court deny both the petitioner's motion requesting nunc pro tunc relief (doc. 9) and his motion seeking a preliminary injunction and "U visa" certification (doc. 10). (Id.). No party has filed any objections.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS her recommendation. Accordingly, the court finds that the portion of the petition requesting review of the order removing the petitioner to Venezuela is due to be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and the remaining portion of the petition challenging the petitioner's continued detention is due to be DENIED. Furthermore, both the petitioner's motion requesting nunc pro tunc relief (doc. 9) and his motion seeking a preliminary injunction and "U visa" certification (doc. 10) are due to be DENIED.

The court will enter a Final Order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer