MIMS v. BENTLEY, 7:15-cv-00119-LSC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20151020623
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 19, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER , District Judge . Plaintiff Hasalee Mims filed a document entitled "Plaintiff's Objection to the Court Ruling." The Court interprets this document as a Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to Alter or Amend a Judgment. Mims's Motion is nonresponsive to the reasons given for dismissal and does nothing more than repeat the arguments presented in his initial complaint. The Motion does discuss that the statute he is objecting to has been rep
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER , District Judge . Plaintiff Hasalee Mims filed a document entitled "Plaintiff's Objection to the Court Ruling." The Court interprets this document as a Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to Alter or Amend a Judgment. Mims's Motion is nonresponsive to the reasons given for dismissal and does nothing more than repeat the arguments presented in his initial complaint. The Motion does discuss that the statute he is objecting to has been repe..
More
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hasalee Mims filed a document entitled "Plaintiff's Objection to the Court Ruling." The Court interprets this document as a Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to Alter or Amend a Judgment. Mims's Motion is nonresponsive to the reasons given for dismissal and does nothing more than repeat the arguments presented in his initial complaint. The Motion does discuss that the statute he is objecting to has been repealed, and it does not provide any reason why the statute of limitations for a § 1983 claim for damages should be tolled. Accordingly, Mims's Motion is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
