Ramirez v. Rathman, 2:12-cv-03580-WMA-SGC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160404805
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr. , District Judge . This is an action on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Jason John Ramirez, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se. (Doc. 1). The magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation on March 1, 2016, recommending Ramirez's 2241 petition be denied to the extent it challenges the Bureau of Prisons's computation of his aggregate sentence and dismissed to the extent it alleges a substantive
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr. , District Judge . This is an action on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Jason John Ramirez, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se. (Doc. 1). The magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation on March 1, 2016, recommending Ramirez's 2241 petition be denied to the extent it challenges the Bureau of Prisons's computation of his aggregate sentence and dismissed to the extent it alleges a substantive ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge.
This is an action on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by Jason John Ramirez, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se. (Doc. 1). The magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation on March 1, 2016, recommending Ramirez's § 2241 petition be denied to the extent it challenges the Bureau of Prisons's computation of his aggregate sentence and dismissed to the extent it alleges a substantive sentencing error. (Doc. 10). The magistrate judge further recommended Ramirez's requests for appointment of counsel and a hearing be denied. (Id.). Ramirez was afforded fourteen (14) days to file objections to the report and recommendation. (See id.). More than fourteen (14) days have passed, and the court has received no objections from Ramirez.1
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report, the court ADOPTS that report and ACCEPTS the magistrate judge's recommendations. Accordingly, Ramirez's requests for appointment of counsel and a hearing are DENIED. Furthermore, Ramirez's § 2241 petition is DENIED to the extent it challenges the Bureau of Prisons's computation of his aggregate sentence and DISMISSED to the extent it alleges a substantive sentencing error. A final judgment will be entered.
FootNotes
1. A copy of the report and recommendation was mailed to Ramirez by the court on March 2, 2016 but was returned as UNDELIVERABLE on March 29, 2016 (Doc. 11). Ramirez has failed to provide the court a new address.
Source: Leagle
