HOWARD v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 6:15-cv-904-WMA-TMP. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160525915
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr. , District Judge . The magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation on May 2, 2016, recommending dismissal of petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. (Doc. 11). To date no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed. Having now carefully considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr. , District Judge . The magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation on May 2, 2016, recommending dismissal of petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. (Doc. 11). To date no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed. Having now carefully considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge.
The magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation on May 2, 2016, recommending dismissal of petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. (Doc. 11). To date no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed. Having now carefully considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be ADOPTED and the recommendation ACCEPTED.
It is therefore ORDERED that the claim for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause be and hereby is DENIED and DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
