Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. SANTIAGO-SANTIAGO, 2:16-CR-376-VEH-HGD-1. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama Number: infdco20170503937 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 02, 2017
Latest Update: May 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS , District Judge . The Defendant in this action, Antonio Santiago-Santiago (Santiago) has filed a motion to suppress evidence seized from his motor vehicle as a result of a stop by a law enforcement officer. (Doc. 28). A hearing on the motion was held before a United States Magistrate Judge at the Hugo Black Federal Courthouse in Birmingham, Alabama on April 13, 2017. (Doc. 33 at 1). On April 18, 2017, the magistrate issued a Report and Recommendation wherein
More

ORDER

The Defendant in this action, Antonio Santiago-Santiago (Santiago) has filed a motion to suppress evidence seized from his motor vehicle as a result of a stop by a law enforcement officer. (Doc. 28). A hearing on the motion was held before a United States Magistrate Judge at the Hugo Black Federal Courthouse in Birmingham, Alabama on April 13, 2017. (Doc. 33 at 1). On April 18, 2017, the magistrate issued a Report and Recommendation wherein he recommended "that the motion to suppress the evidence seized during the search of Santiago's vehicle be DENIED." (Doc. 33 at 9). The deadline to object to that recommendation has now expired and no objections have been filed.

Having carefully reviewed de novo the entire file in this case, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate's recommendation is due to be, and hereby is, ADOPTED and ACCEPTED as the opinion of this Court. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS that the motion to suppress the evidence seized during the search of Santiago's vehicle is due to be, and hereby is, DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer