U.S. v. Henderson, 16-CR-182-LSC-JEO. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20170505844
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 04, 2017
Latest Update: May 04, 2017
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation L. SCOTT COOGLER , District Judge . This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable John E. Ott, United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. 62] entered the 19th day of April, 2017, as well as the objections to the Report and Recommendation made by the Defendant, Richard Alan Henderson. This Court has made a de novo determination of those findings and portions objected to by the defendant in this case as well as all of the issues a
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation L. SCOTT COOGLER , District Judge . This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable John E. Ott, United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. 62] entered the 19th day of April, 2017, as well as the objections to the Report and Recommendation made by the Defendant, Richard Alan Henderson. This Court has made a de novo determination of those findings and portions objected to by the defendant in this case as well as all of the issues ad..
More
Order Accepting Report and Recommendation
L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable John E. Ott, United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. 62] entered the 19th day of April, 2017, as well as the objections to the Report and Recommendation made by the Defendant, Richard Alan Henderson. This Court has made a de novo determination of those findings and portions objected to by the defendant in this case as well as all of the issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation.
It is Ordered that the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable John E. Ott, United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. 62] entered the 19th day of April, 2017 be and hereby is accepted as entered. This court adopts the Report and Recommendation as the Order of this court as if the same were set forth at this point in extenso. The objections made by the defendant are overruled. The Amended Motion to Dismiss count two, the "bank bribery" count of the indictment [Doc. 53] is Denied.
Source: Leagle
